Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
文/编辑：健康阿尔文7Y6h
On the global economic stage, the trade war between China and the United States is undoubtedly one of the most high-profile events in recent years.
At the beginning, in order to contain China's rise, the United States did not hesitate to implement extreme measures in a vain attempt to gain the upper hand with the power of turning the clouds and rain.
It didn't turn out to be as simple as expected.
One of Trump's notable strategies during his administration has been a trade war with China.
To achieve so-called "United States First," he plans to impose a 60 percent tariff on all Chinese products.
This move shook the business world, and countless businesses faced unprecedented challenges.
An analysis in the New York Times poured cold water on him, pointing out that Trump's trade war with China was a complete failure.
The chapter details the ups and downs of the U.S.-China trade war and concludes that China is actually the winner.
Indeed, despite United States' best efforts, China's economy has not stopped, but has withstood the pressure and shown strong resilience.
The trade war has made China deeply aware of the risks of relying on the external market, thus accelerating the pace of development of the domestic market and independent innovation in science and technology.
This strategy of both internal and external cultivation has not only stabilized China's economy, but also gained a firm foothold on the global economic map.
In contrast, the trade deficit in the United States has not improved, but has increased, despite its tough stance on competition.
This has left United States facing great confusion and pressure.
Trump failed to do so, and Biden took over, but apparently failed to find an effective new strategy for China.
They continue to impose new tariffs on Chinese products, hoping to turn the tide through economic pressure.
This series of actions has not only drawn international criticism, but also sparked widespread discontent at home.
United States scholars and economists have questioned the policy, pointing out that this strategy is nothing more than a thousand enemies and eight hundred self-harm to United States businesses and consumers.
And in this protracted game, the rise in unemployment, the rise in prices and the slowdown in the economy have left the people helpless and angry.
Behind this so-called "trade war" is actually a reflection of the deep-seated rivalry between China and the United States.
Both countries are striving for dominance in the fields of science and technology, economy, and so on.
In today's globalized world, unilateralism is clearly not working, and more cooperation and compromise between different countries are needed.
In the complexity of international relations, economic competition should not be a zero-sum game.
In this context, Musk has asserted that if the United States continues to do so, it will inevitably move in a direction.
The rhetoric seemed to decipher a more insidious truth: If United States fails to rethink its role and strategy on the global stage, the bottom line of its economic freedom may be forced to move back.
In particular, due to the improper tariff policy, United States dock workers took to the streets and went on strike to express their dissatisfaction with the decision.
As an important hub for import and export, the efficiency of the terminal directly affects all aspects of the economy.
The strikes reveal not only the dissatisfaction of ordinary people in United States with policy, but also the huge gap between policymakers and public expectations.
Behind this uproar, Musk's words have attracted widespread attention.
He said that if Trump loses the election, United States will inevitably go head.
The phrase was interpreted by many as support for Trump and was even considered part of his campaign strategy.
As an important representative of the technology industry, Musk's views have sparked widespread discussion in both the business and technology circles.
Musk's comments have undoubtedly added fuel to the fire of an already chaotic situation.
In this contest with the economy, Trump, as a highly controversial leader, has often had a strong unilateralist and protectionist overtone.
If he comes to power again, it is highly likely that extreme protectionist measures will be further intensified.
Such a policy seems to safeguard national interests, but in fact it satisfies the selfish interests of the United States chaebols more than the immediate needs of ordinary people.
Protectionism does not make the United States economy stronger, but it may make it less competitive in the global market.
Overprotection of technology and manufacturing may lead to a decline in the efficiency of resource allocation and hindering technological innovation.
More importantly, such policies may not address the deep-seated problems within the United States economy.
The chain reaction triggered by the Sino-US trade war has made all walks of life in the United States deeply reflect.
However, in the turbulent international economic environment, if the United States wants to achieve a real recovery, it may need to find new breakthroughs in policy.
More opening up to the outside world and finding a balance between common interests and cooperation may be the long-term solution.
Some people say that economic competition is, after all, a contest between talent and innovation.
How to attract outstanding global talents and promote scientific and technological innovation and industrial upgrading is fundamental to maintaining economic vitality and creativity in United States.
As Musk said, in the face of fierce global economic competition, United States should be vigilant that only by getting rid of extremist thinking can we achieve sustainable development and prosperity.
All in all, tariff policy is just a short-sighted stopgap measure.
Future challenges require United States to face up to internal contradictions and external competition, and create conditions for its own and global economic prosperity through more rational policies and pragmatic cooperation.
And this may be the real consideration for the well-being of the people and the interests of the country.
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.