Liaoning Guangdong Second World War, broadcast aphasia.
Why? In this focus war, there was a conflict between Han Dejun and Weems, but no one knew why, and Han Dejun, who fell to the ground, suddenly got up to fight with Weems, and finally both were expelled.
The live broadcast did not give any explanation, why Daehan and Weems fought, and why the referee wanted to take power of both people and punish them.
The live broadcast gave a replay shot: Weems broke through, Han Dejun lost his position, and the right hand stopped the person to block the foul, but Weems pushed the person to attack the foul. Referee Duan Zhu gave both sides a foul on the spot, then watched the replay to determine whether to upgrade.
Duan Zhu just walked to the replay screen, and suddenly found that there was a conflict on the field, Dahan and Weems twisted into a mess, the two sides tried their best to pull, and could only rush to the scene immediately, and finally punished both of them.
During this period, there was no live sound in the live broadcast, and there was no cause of the playback conflict.
If we carefully watch Weems push people, before pushing people, his right arm first hit Han Dejun's face, and only afterwards did we know that Han Dejun was elbowed to the bridge of the nose bone, and the nasal bone was fractured.
Another source told me that Weems thought that Han was a fake fall and kept doing fake fall movements, causing Daehan to lose control.
But there is not enough camera language to tell us the cause of the conflict, fortunately the referee is properly controlled, and the conflict does not expand. However, from the time Korea was elbowed to the time the clashes broke out, there was still a lack of enough camera language.
I understand the difficulties of live sports now, and we need to convey positive energy and avoid the spread of negative emotions. But sports have the particularity of sports, the blood on the field is tense, anger starts from the heart, evil is born to the side of the guts, and adrenaline cannot be controlled by the word calm. The occurrence of a transgressive action is sometimes intentional, most of the time unintentional, so the referee only focuses on the process, regardless of the purpose and result. This is the "process orientation" advocated by the CBA in these seasons.
The more evasive the live broadcast, the more discussion it will cause.
For example, in the third section, Guo Allen's foot this time caused a lot of discussion. Did Hu Mingxuan have any feet? This shot playback alone is not clear. Hu Mingxuan was not convicted of a foul on the spot, and Ellen did not stand up for a while, which was very painful. Did Hu Mingxuan fall inside Guo Allen's cylinder, or did he not? No more angle replay, not good judgment.
After Han Dejun and Weems were expelled and resumed the game, Hu Mingxuan had another foul after Zhao Jiwei's three-point shot and was directly convicted of violating the body. Since Hu Mingxuan had already violated the body once to defend against counterattacks, he was directly expelled twice.
From this point of view, Hu Mingxuan's landing is no problem. However, due to the fact that there was already a foot of Guo Allen before, the referee determined that it was a stepping foot after watching the replay.
Enough angles of playback, you can restore the facts, how to judge how to judge, after all, basketball games are not murder scenes, there are good people and bad people.
We watch CBA games in Migu, but Migu is only the secondary producer of the game signal, or the finisher, because the original signal is provided by the CBA league, what they give is what. Once the picture is incomplete, it will cause confusion in the viewing.
Last week I was broadcasting the beijing and Guangsha matches in Migu live, and suddenly the game stopped, only to listen to the noise in the headphones, and the camera kept giving three referees, without knowing what was happening on the field. Then a referee gave a "T" gesture, but there was no free throw, and the game began. Then, seeing the protesting expression of Guangsha head coach Wang Bo, he directly ate a "T".
Later, I learned that a female reporter at the scene had a verbal conflict with the team members when the Beijing team was free throwing, the referee gave the Beijing team "T", and was vetoed, Wang Bo protested, ate the "T", so he wanted to take the penalty.
Deliberately avoiding certain scenes on the field, including some foul scenes, and concealing them, this phenomenon has become more and more this season, thinking that it can reduce discussion, but in fact, it has increased unnecessary speculation, discussion and even argument. You broadcast the whole process, let people see clearly, I can tell you the merits, what the rules are; in order to avoid what not to broadcast, let the game stop there out of thin air, the effect is counterproductive.
The second battle in Liaoning and Guangdong is worth watching, but after the game, social media was flooded with various regional attacks. If the playback from various angles is clear, the facts can be restored to the greatest extent to correct the audio-visual.
This game is very worth watching, Liaoning is aggressive, Guangdong is reluctant to fall, is a fairly valuable preview before the playoffs. It's a shame that the extra-match factors were diluted.
Guangdong has encountered various difficulties this season: the UAE League returned from a major injury, the champion Weems fell in form, and Zhao Rui was suspended due to injury, allowing their ranking to fall to seventh at one point. The Liaoning team was neatly arranged, Guo Allen was fully mature, and zhang Zhenlin was blessed with a front line, and this battle was opened and hung.
But Guangdong did not want to lose, this battle made full preparations, starting from the restriction of Guo Allen, wanted to directly break the Liaoning team's veins, the second quarter only let the Liaoning team score 16 points, the third quarter ended to play 75-75. What would have happened if Han, Weems, and Hu Mingxuan hadn't been punished? Or it depends on the game itself.
In fact, the key to this game is not the conflict, but the ability of the two sides to break the joint defense, because Liaoning and Guangdong spent most of the second half in the defense of the joint defense, Liaoning used 1-3-1, Guangdong used 3-2 and 2-3. The most important thing about breaking a league defense is not to stand on the free throw line with a big man, but to have a good passer on the outside.
The real victory in this battle was Zhao Jiwei, and the result was Fu Hao. The Guangdong team did not have Zhao Rui, Hu Mingxuan was sent out, and only Xu Jie was left at the core defender. In the end, Fu Hao scored 38 points and Xu Jie scored 22 points, which were the highest of the two teams, and it was the joint defense that forced out their respective bottom cards.
I think the winner is still on the fourth quarter to break the joint defense: Zhao Jiwei passed the cover of Moland three times in a row in 7 minutes and 17 seconds, 6 minutes 44 seconds, 6 minutes and 10 seconds, respectively, by his own hit three points, pass Morand to the basket, pass how to layup, this wave of 7-0 to open the score of 91-80. Both sides have national team defenders, and the key to breaking the joint defense is the one that receives the ball on the inside line.
This also reflects the current comparison of the internal strength of the two teams, the UAE League returned from a major injury, and there was no big outside help, while Fu Hao was younger, with Daehan and Morland around him. The absence of Guangdong team Zhao Rui, the loss is greater than one less foreign aid.
After the two wars, Liaoning completely occupied the commanding heights of confidence, and the suspense of Guangdong was when Zhao Rui came back, and whether the legendary Big Wai would come.