Some time ago, some netizens picked up an old article published in the famous theoretical journal "Learning" magazine more than 60 years ago, as a proof that Academician He Zuoxiu once proposed to demolish the Forbidden City. The article was clearly placed there, and many netizens on the Internet attacked in groups, saying that Academician He Zuoxiu not only had the idea of "demolishing the Forbidden City", but also came up with such an idea. This article made the old academician He Zuoxiu difficult to argue, and no matter how he explained it, it seemed pale and weak.
In fact, there are some things that don't need to be explained, things are there, everyone will have their own judgment and analysis, and the more they explain, the less clear they become. If you don't explain it, it may pass slowly after a long time. Therefore, recently, no one has mentioned whether Academician He Zuoxiu has made such a suggestion as demolishing the Forbidden City. However, others didn't mention it, but Academician He Zuoxiu was bringing up this controversy himself, and he didn't know what his old man's purpose was.
On June 28, 2024, regarding whether there was a proposal to demolish the Forbidden City, Academician He Zuoxiu once again posted an article to defend himself, this is not my idea, I just wrote a critical article and published it. The general content of Academician He Zuoxiu's defense is as follows:
Who advocates the demolition of the Forbidden City? At the beginning of the criticism of Liang Sicheng's retro ideas, Peng Zhen ordered a group of architects and some theoretical workers to gather in the Changguan Hall of the Summer Palace to study many of Comrade Mao Zedong's instructions, and wrote about 20 critical manuscripts. The Propaganda Department of the CPC Central Committee sent me to participate in this work, and since the critical article I wrote was finalized relatively quickly, Peng Zhentong decided to publish the article first in the February issue of the journal "Study".
As soon as Liang Sicheng saw this critical draft, he immediately made a self-criticism at a meeting of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) in March and published it in Guangming Daily. As soon as Comrade Peng Zhen saw Liang Sicheng's self-criticism, he called a meeting of these writers, saying that they had already made self-criticism, so they should not publish other articles publicly.
Regarding the question of whether the Forbidden City was demolished, Academician He Zuoxiu once again publicly defended himself, which made netizens a little dissatisfied! Netizens said that why didn't Academician He Zuoxiu dare to take responsibility for what he wrote, it seems that in Academician He Zuoxiu's heart, everything that is wrong is someone else's, as long as the credit belongs to him.
Netizens also believe that when netizens have forgotten the topic of demolishing the Forbidden City, Academician He Zuoxiu deliberately provoked it again. This obvious quibble is undoubtedly exposed. Some netizens carefully read the text in the article of Academician He Zuoxiu again, and did not say such a thing as not demolishing the Forbidden City. On the contrary, what his old man said was that because it was inconvenient for the masses, it could be demolished!
Finally, I want to express that the tone of a netizen's comment is more amiable. This netizen said that through Academician He Zuoxiu's re-justification today, the problem is already very clear! It seems that Academician He Lao must have written the article "to demolish the Forbidden City" under specific historical conditions. However, from today's point of view, at least from a technical point of view, I think Mr. Liang Sicheng is a visionary and worthy of being a professional! Academician He Zuoxiu grasped the pulse of the times and seemed to be on the political side back then.
#头条创作挑战赛#