According to recent reports by Russian media, the governor of Sevastopol Oblast, Mikhail Razvozhaev, citing final data, said that after the Ukrainian attack on Sevastopol, four people were killed, including 2 children, and another 153 people were injured, including 27 children.
In this regard, "Russia Today accuses Washington of being on the side of terrorism", because the Ukrainian army used American-made ATACMS missiles in the attack on Sevastopol, which happened to be carried out at the most crowded moment on the beach.
Civilian houses in Sevastopol were attacked
U.S. media recently quoted U.S. security officials as saying that in May this year, German metal manufacturer Deere was set on fire to a factory in Berlin, and intelligence showed that Russian agents were the culprits in the arson.
German investigators later said the fire was an accident, and Deere's insurance company investigated and concluded that the fire was caused by a technical problem.
On the surface, it seems that NATO is only one evidence away from personally ending up with the Russian army, but NATO member states have their own plans, and under the premise that NATO is not monolithic, there will be no situation in which NATO will end up in person.
Nato
The biggest reason is that France, one of the members of NATO, does not plan to let the United States continue to "dominate European affairs", which Macron has made clear during his visit to Germany that he hopes Europe can seek "independence".
In addition, the United States has never exchanged fire with any nuclear-armed country since the end of World War II, and the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan at the end of World War II, and it is also the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons in actual combat so far.
Although Russia has repeatedly stated that Ukraine and the West have crossed the red line of Russia's use of nuclear weapons, Russia will not drop nuclear weapons until the last minute.
The Ukrainian army launched ATACMS missiles
On the surface, it seems that the Sevastopol attack has hit Russia hard, and even publicly condemned the United States for planning the attack behind the scenes, and even because of the arson of the German factory, NATO is only one step away from the end of the attack, but in fact NATO is not ready for the end.
At the G7 summit held on June 13, the G7 decided to use Russia's frozen assets worth a total of $300 billion as collateral to aid Ukraine by $50 billion. It shows that the G7 is not ready to end up in person, but plans to continue to deal with Russia through the hands of Ukraine.
On June 25, Pentagon spokesman Patrick Ryder said in response to the attack on Sevastopol that the US authorities do not want civilians to die and will discuss this issue with Kyiv.
Patrick Ryder
It shows that the attitude of the Americans is very clear that they will not openly seek-for-tat confrontation with Russia. However, Ryder seems to have forgotten the crucial point that if the United States had not lifted the restrictions on the use of American-made weapons by the Ukrainian army to attack the Russian mainland, there would have been no civilian deaths in Sevastopol, no wonder the Russian media would think that "Washington is on the side of terrorism."
Of course, from the successive lifting of restrictions on the use of weapons by the Ukrainian army by the United States, it is even more certain that NATO has no intention of ending up, or that the United States has no intention of ending up.
On the one hand, Biden needs to go all out to deal with the first round of the televised debate in the US election, and on the other hand, the United States is not ready to open fire with the nuclear powers.
In addition, Russia has been attacked many times, and many important targets have been damaged, such as the Russian army's strategic early warning radar "Voronezh DM" and the Russian Su-57, A-50 early warning aircraft and other equipment damaged, Russia has not chosen to throw away nuclear weapons, indicating that the Russian army is not ready to use nuclear weapons to attack the West.
And the US-led NATO is also not ready to withstand a nuclear strike, especially since the United States has never been willing to risk a nuclear attack on its homeland and engage in a firefight with the Russian army.
Otherwise, NATO would not have "frantically exported" behind Ukraine's back, trying to turn the Ukrainian army into a "sharp dagger".
(Text/Mr. Zhuge )