Recently, Chinese talk show actor Li Xueqin's college entrance examination scores and admission experience have become the focus of public discussion. Born in 1995 in Tieling, Liaoning Province, Li Xueqin is not only a graduate of Peking University's School of Journalism and Communication, but also studied at New York University. She has received a lot of attention for recording videos to chase stars, but recently, her college entrance examination scores and admission methods have sparked a discussion about the fairness of college entrance examinations.
Li Xueqin's high school alma mater was investigated for her sports bonus points, which called into question her college entrance examination scores. Some netizens pointed out that Li Xueqin blew up in the interview that she couldn't swim, but she had a second-level swimming athlete certificate, which made people doubt whether her certificate was real. However, Li Xueqin's classmates at Peking University responded that her college entrance examination score was 633 points, and the independent enrollment did not examine sports scores, and she did not have sports bonus points.
This incident sparked a heated discussion among netizens. Some netizens said that in order to achieve the fairness of the college entrance examination, the national test paper should be unified. It has also been suggested that even if Li Xueqin forgets her swimming skills, it seems unlikely that she will forget how to swim as a second-level athlete. In addition, some netizens questioned how she obtained the second-level swimmer certificate if she couldn't swim.
In this discussion, some people pointed out that Li Xueqin entered Peking University through independent enrollment plus 20 points, but the focus of attention was whether she had falsified her second-level athlete certificate. Although this certificate was not ultimately used for her admission, the issue of the authenticity of the certificate still raised concerns.
Li Xueqin's naked scores in the college entrance examination were also disclosed: 131 points in Chinese, 140 points in mathematics, 138 points in foreign languages, 224 points in literature comprehensive, and a total score of 633 points. Combined with the 20 points of independent admissions, her total score reached 653 points. However, some netizens pointed out that in Henan Province, a score of 653 may be difficult to enter even 985 universities, so you can only choose 211 schools.
This discussion is not only about Li Xueqin's personal college entrance examination scores, but also about a deep reflection on the fairness of the college entrance examination system. In China, the gaokao is seen as an important way to change one's fate, and every discussion about the fairness of the gaokao can attract widespread attention from society. Li Xueqin's case undoubtedly provides an opportunity for the public to re-examine the college entrance examination system.
We should realize that although the college entrance examination system is constantly being reformed and improved, there are still some areas that need to be improved. How to ensure that every candidate can compete in a fair environment, and how to make the college entrance examination more transparent and fair, are problems that we need to continue to explore and solve.
At the same time, we should also see that Li Xueqin, as a public figure, her success depends not only on her college entrance examination scores, but also on her talent and hard work. While discussing the fairness of the college entrance examination, we should also respect everyone's efforts and achievements, and should not completely deny a person's ownership because of one incident.
In short, the incident of turning over Li Xueqin's old accounts is not only a test for her personally, but also a challenge to the concept of fairness in the college entrance examination for the whole society. I hope that through this discussion, we can think more deeply about the improvement of the college entrance examination system, and how to respect and recognize the unique value of each person while ensuring fairness.