For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to see more content in time, click "Follow", we update wonderful stories for you every day, and share different story moments
Text: Wolf Tooth Military Division
Edited by the Wolf Tooth Division
Preface
The defeat of the Chinese men's basketball team has aroused heated discussions, and Guo Shiqiang's employment strategy has been questioned
In yesterday's basketball court, the Chinese men's basketball team did not go as smoothly as people expected, but lost with a score of 78-83. This result not only disappointed the fans, but also sparked a heated discussion about the team's employment strategy after the game. Many voices have pointed to acting coach Guo Shiqiang, questioning his tactical choices of "nepotism" and "ignoring young players".
This game, for the Chinese men's basketball team, should be a good opportunity to train newcomers. After all, it has long been clear that the priority now is to develop young players for the 2027 World Cup and the 2028 Olympic Games.
However, under the leadership of Guo Shiqiang, we saw a different scene: 28-year-old Gao Shiyan and 27-year-old Zhu Mingzhen and other "veterans" occupied a lot of playing time, while potential stars such as Lin Wei, Zhao Weilun, and Chen Guohao could only sit on the sidelines and missed the game.
Such an employment strategy undoubtedly made fans feel puzzled and disappointed. After all, in the world of basketball, renewal is an inevitable law. Only by constantly discovering and nurturing new talents can we ensure the long-term competitiveness of the team. Guo Shiqiang doesn't seem to realize this, relying too much on players who are already entering the latter stages of their careers, and neglecting the growth and improvement of young players.
What's even more incomprehensible is Guo Shiqiang's preference for Gao Shiyan and Zhu Mingzhen. Although these two players have a certain strength in the CBA league, their age and potential are no longer enough to support the future of the Chinese men's basketball team.
In particular, Gao Shiyan was abandoned many times in the previous national team selection, but he was immediately reused after Guo Shiqiang took office. This approach not only made other players feel unfair, but also made fans question Guo Shiqiang's employment strategy.
After the game, Guo Shiqiang explained his criteria for selecting the 12-man roster at a press conference. He said it was based on the first 10 days of training matches and the overall performance of the players.
Such explanations did not quell the doubts of fans. On the contrary, more people began to question Guo Shiqiang's vision and tactical arrangement.
As a basketball enthusiast, I know that winning and losing a basketball game is a common thing. However, the problems exposed by the Chinese men's basketball team in this defeat are worth pondering. What we need is not just a win in one game, but also a team with energy, potential and future.
Therefore, I call on the management and coaching team of the Chinese men's basketball team to pay attention to the cultivation and discovery of young players, and give them more opportunities and trust. Only in this way can the Chinese men's basketball team go further and more stable in the future.
Looking back at this game and the controversy after the game, we can clearly see the problems in the Chinese men's basketball team's employment strategy. Guo Shiqiang's "cronyism" and "neglect of young players" not only made the team lose its competitiveness in the game, but also made fans worry about the future of the team.
Therefore, I hope that the Chinese men's basketball team can learn this lesson, re-examine its employment strategy, and lay a solid foundation for the long-term development of the team.
epilogue
I wonder how much you know about this? Welcome to leave your thoughts in the comment area below, like the article, remember to like and follow us, see you next time.
Warm reminder, this article is the original first work of Toutiao, it is forbidden to move to other platforms within 72 hours, the rights protection function of the whole network has been opened, and the plagiarism porter has complained and reported on the whole network, thank you for your understanding