Wolf culture seems to have little to do with the wolf itself.
Just as there are only people in this world, there is no superman.
As for the wolf species, we use the "irrefutable rational cognition" summarized by realistic and objective experience to declare that the world
There are only ordinary wolves, ordinary wolves, and no super wolves in this world.
Because only the super wolf can ensure that in the process of traveling thousands of miles, there are no scruples in eating meat, and there is no need to bear the consequences, whether it is in the face of the pursuit of natural enemies, or the sinister natural situation, or even the terrain and disease troubles, you can use the identity of the super wolf (given by people with ulterior motives) to eliminate all the impact.
The rest is the real essence, which is what people want to see, the courage, courage, and indomitable will represented by the phrase wolf eating meat for thousands of miles.
What about what people don't want to see?
These are things that perhaps only a real wolf will tell you.
There is no superwolf in this world, just as there is no superman in this world.
Survival is not a very complicated thing for the average wolf.
Through the instinct to hunt, and the sniffing of dangerous things, including, more importantly, the necessity of survival in human society, these various things are softened together,
If you survive, you will survive, what if you can't survive?
Then don't do it.
So from the underlying logic of survival, for wolves, what to eat is secondary,
The key is to have something to eat.
The hotly discussed Internet celebrity wolf some time ago is a typical example, a lone wolf far away from the waves, in the process of contact with humans, learned a "realistic hunting method",
Some people eat obediently when they are fed, some people don't grin when they take photos, and the way they ask for physical objects does not touch people's bottom line, and there is no aggressive behavior towards humans.
In this way, the Internet celebrity wolf has become a local characteristic landscape, and some people will come here to take a look, feed the wolf and take a group photo, all in one go.
It turns out that wolves don't need to travel thousands of miles, and they eat much more than meat.
Of course, we can't say that all wolves are treated like this, but if we insist that wolves travel thousands of miles to eat meat, then we must pay attention to the impact of the concept of survivorship bias.
How many wolves can travel thousands of miles?
How many wolves can travel thousands of miles to eat meat?
I have consulted relevant information, generally speaking, wolves are animals with a low probability of dying well, and in general, wolves will be threatened by large and small threats in the process of growth and survival, most of which can make them lose their lives.
In human society, there are fewer and fewer things about wolves hurting people, and there are more and more incidents of people hurting wolves.
Interestingly, this transformation, both the former and the latter, is about survival.
The establishment of the reserve has provided better conditions for the survival of wolves, and the coveted demand for what is on the wolf has become a precondition for hunting wolves.
It is difficult for wolves who can travel thousands of miles to be proud of eating meat, on the other hand, those wolves who are kept in captivity are no longer obsessed with eating meat.
Therefore, the fact that the wolf travels thousands of miles to eat meat, from a spiritual point of view, may indeed have motivational significance.
But in terms of reality, no wolf is willing to be proud of traveling thousands of miles and eating the flesh of all things.
Or the wolf, a creature, in addition to the sense of herd and instinct-based survival needs,
So the idea of wolf nature itself,
It is not wolves that serve, but people.
So now it seems that it is not those real wolves who really take out the concept of wolf nature and eat meat for thousands of miles.
It's the food they used to have, the owners they are now.
Oh, these guys may just be people,
Their status is not yet "in charge".
I've seen documentaries about wolves, and no matter how the creature is elevated to a spiritual totem, they can't help but talk about a very realistic concept.
That is the relationship between man and wolf, and it is impossible to trust absolutely.
Or to put it bluntly, wolves are cannibals.
It is true that in the eyes of those who preach the spirit of wolf, the courage and courage of wolves to travel thousands of miles to eat meat, as well as the indispensable courage, can be taken out and processed and become an example for learning.
Even this wolf spirit can be "deeply processed" and become a tool to restrain certain people and spur certain groups.
So if you think about it this way, although wolves rarely eat people now,
But the wolf's "spirit" can swagger and devour the lives of many migrant workers.
In the past, people always talked about wolves in sheep's clothing as a kind of sin in disguise.
So now,
What should we make of those who are "in wolf's clothing"?