laitimes

Marriage is not poverty alleviation! The woman felt sorry for her parents, and she wanted her future husband to take 5,000 a month to fulfill her filial piety

author:Five-year love said

In modern society, marriage and filial piety, as traditional virtues of the Chinese nation, are often mentioned and discussed. However, when the two are closely linked to money, it can lead to a series of controversies and reflections. Recently, a Jiangxi girl disclosed her mate selection conditions on social media, and one of the requirements for giving her parents 5,000 yuan per month has become the focus of public discussion.

Marriage is not poverty alleviation! The woman felt sorry for her parents, and she wanted her future husband to take 5,000 a month to fulfill her filial piety

The girl said she hoped that her future husband would be able to give 5,000 yuan a month to support her parents as a way to express her gratitude for their parenting grace. However, this request soon sparked heated discussions among netizens. Some people see it as a sign of filial piety, while others see marriage as a transaction, or even an act of "poverty alleviation".

Marriage is not poverty alleviation! The woman felt sorry for her parents, and she wanted her future husband to take 5,000 a month to fulfill her filial piety

In fact, it is indisputable that filial piety to parents is everyone's responsibility and obligation. But when this filial piety is linked to marriage, especially when it is quantified as a fixed monthly amount, one can't help but wonder: where is the line between marriage and filial piety? What role does money play in this?

Marriage is not poverty alleviation! The woman felt sorry for her parents, and she wanted her future husband to take 5,000 a month to fulfill her filial piety

First and foremost, marriage should be based on mutual respect, equality, and true love. If one party sees marriage as a transaction, or even uses it to achieve some kind of purpose for himself, then such a marriage is not destined to last. Therefore, it is undoubtedly a blasphemy against marriage to directly link filial piety to marriage, or even to quantify filial piety into money.

Marriage is not poverty alleviation! The woman felt sorry for her parents, and she wanted her future husband to take 5,000 a month to fulfill her filial piety

Secondly, filial piety to parents is everyone's responsibility and obligation, but this does not mean that this responsibility is to be completely passed on to the other party. In marriage, both parties should share the responsibilities and obligations of the family, including the support of both parents. If one party unilaterally demands that the other parent take on the responsibility of supporting his or her parents, or even quantifies this responsibility in money, then this is undoubtedly an unfair claim to the other party.

In addition, we should also recognize that filial piety to one's parents is not the same as satisfying one's parents' requirements indefinitely. Parents should also understand their children's situation and difficulties, and not completely transfer their own pressure to their children. In the same way, children should be filial within their own means, and not sacrifice their own interests in order to meet certain demands of their parents.

To sum up, marriage and filial piety are two independent but interrelated concepts. In marriage, we should respect each other's choices and decisions, and share the responsibilities and obligations of the family. In terms of filial piety, we should do our best to care for and take care of our parents, but we should also avoid directly linking filial piety to money, so as not to cause unnecessary stress and misunderstanding in marriage. Only in this way can we truly achieve the harmony and unity of marriage and filial piety.

What are your thoughts on this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area!

Read on