I was worried about writing something today, and suddenly found an article about the Forbidden City, and out of curiosity, I opened the article and went in to "shop".
The article has a good idea, writing about the magnificent beauty and long history of the Forbidden City. It seems that he does have a certain understanding of the Forbidden City in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, and his writing is relatively smooth.
However, this article added a few comments of its own when writing about the gilded vat of the Forbidden City, and there was a more obvious error. The following paragraph is the author's introduction, which is more accurate:
According to records, there were originally 308 large tanks in the Forbidden City, but now only 231 are left. The cylinders of the Ming Dynasty were iron cylinders, and most of them were copper cylinders in the Ming and Qing dynasties, while the gilded copper cylinders were all the handiwork of Qing Dynasty craftsmen. ”
However, when the author evaluates and introduces the history of these vats, there is a defect of "flickering the mouth".
You must know that the Forbidden City was completed in 1420, and by 2024 this year, it will only be 604 years old. Besides, these gilded vats began in the Qianlong period of the Qing Dynasty and were formed in the hands of corrupt and corrupt He Shen (among them, there is another theory of He Shen's deceit). Emperor Qianlong ascended the throne in 1711, even if, I mean, "even if" there were these gilded jars in the first year of Qianlong, it is only 313 years old, where does the saying "after a thousand years" come from?
Everyone can talk about history, but only the era and characters must not be joked.