For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to see more content in time, click "Follow", we will update you with wonderful information every day!
Edit: Rose Tea Party
Gearing up, it is another new matter of right and wrong to make waves in the cross talk circle. This time, the protagonist is the famous cross talk performance artist Hou Yaohua, who said in the live broadcast that he would clean up the door on behalf of his late father Hou Baolin and late brother Hou Yaowen and "isolate" the unruly apprentices. As soon as this wild remark came out, it immediately caused heated discussions on the Internet.
Regarding Mr. Hou's remarks, we might as well interpret them from a historical perspective. The Hou family can be described as a family of cross talk, Mr. Hou's father Hou Baolin and elder brother Hou Yaowen are both cross talk masters and are famous in the art world.
After the death of these two masters, the prestige of the Hou family seems to have declined. It stands to reason that Hou Yaohua, as a child, should have inherited and carried forward the art of the Hou family, instead of being so arrogant and intending to "clean up the door".
However, after thinking about it, Mr. Hou's words are actually not unreasonable. The art of cross talk pays attention to rules, and the master-apprentice relationship is one of them.
According to the rules, the master's apprentices should be filial to the master, and even if the master passes away, the apprentice must often worship with incense and report to him on the current situation of his studies and life. If an apprentice behaves misbehaps, such as "jumping m", he should indeed be punished.
From this point of view, Hou Yaohua, as a descendant of the Hou family, is qualified to maintain family rules and family discipline. And what he said about "cleaning the door" and "isolation" is undoubtedly to punish those apprentices who act out of order. It's just that Mr. Hou's approach is too paranoid and aggressive.
However, we can't completely criticize Mr. Hou. As the descendant of a generation of cross talk masters, his understanding and persistence in art have their own uniqueness. Let's look at this from another angle.
In recent years, it is indeed regrettable that many artists have made a fuss on the Internet in order to market themselves and hype up certain topics. However, although Mr. Hou's fierce rhetoric this time was more or less out of a good intention to maintain the purity of art.
He was worried that those apprentices who deviated from their teachers and neglected their duties would corrupt the foundation of cross talk art. That's why he made this deafening statement.
In this sense, although Mr. Hou's approach is a bit excessive, it is also a unique respect and dedication to art. We have reason to believe that he is by no means untargeted, and must have been carefully considered. Moreover, art should always be regarded above all else, and any blasphemy and debasement is unforgivable.
Even if Mr. Hou's approach makes people feel biased, as a senior in the art world, he has taken on the responsibility of justifying the name of cross talk after all. It is incumbent upon us to applaud his intentions, not dictate his actions.
In fact, the discussion sparked by Mr. Hou's move has gone far beyond the superficial issue of "cleaning up the portal". It reflects people's cherishing and reverence for traditional arts. As contemporaries, we should applaud this solemn artistic atmosphere.
Of course, we don't need to embellish Mr. Hou's approach too much. In fact, there is something unreasonable about his actions.
His claim that he wants to clean up the portal "on behalf of" his father and brother is undoubtedly a bit of a self-assertion. According to the rules of cross talk, the apprenticeship relationship of a division commander has no right to take a step beyond Lei Chi. Although Mr. Hou is the heir of his master's family, he can only have the right to dispose of his own apprentices, and has no right to interfere with other masters.
The art of cross talk is not static, and she also needs to keep pace with the times. Mr. Hou proposed to "isolate" those "immoral" apprentices, which is inevitably a bit suspicious of the old. We can't sever the relationship between art and reality because of momentary emotions, which will only bring art to a standstill.
The life circle of artists has always been different from that of ordinary people, and it is difficult for us to fully understand the ins and outs of the dispute between the portals. Whether Mr. Hou's move is out of selfishness and resentment, it is difficult for us to conclude for the time being.
This does not mean that we should completely reject Mr. Hou's original intention. Maybe there are some excesses in his approach, but at least his starting point is worthy of affirmation - that is, the persistent pursuit and persistence of the art of cross talk.
Any art form should be seen as an existence above all else, and it is our duty to be reserved for it. Although Mr. Hou made a mistake this time, the artistic spirit he defended should be remembered and promoted. This dedication to art is the most precious treasure of our time.
It is undeniable that Mr. Hou's move has sparked extensive discussion and reflection both inside and outside the art world. Whether you agree or disagree, you have to admit that this incident has achieved at least one unexpected effect - it has made more people start to pay attention to and think about the development of traditional art in contemporary society.
As an art form with a long history, the inheritance of cross talk has always been full of thorns. It is often challenged by the torrent of the times and the aesthetics of the masses. But because of this, we should applaud the vitality of cross talk art.
Although Mr. Hou's approach was wrong, his statement undoubtedly injected a new impetus into the inheritance of cross talk art. His heroic words remind us that the development of art does not happen overnight, and requires perseverance and perseverance from people of every era.
From this point of view, Mr. Hou's words of "cleaning up the portal" are nothing less than a drum of artistic awakening. It awakens our attention to traditional culture, the development of art, and our desire to stick to our original intention.
After this dispute, many predecessors in the cross talk industry have also expressed their positions, advocating cherishing the foundation of art and carrying forward the artistic tradition. It is foreseeable that in the coming period, a new wave of artistic revival will be set off in the cross talk industry. And all this is thanks to Mr. Hou's "wild words".
Let's not ask Mr. Hou too much for the time being, but calm down and appreciate his good intentions.
After all, the cry of a generation of grandmasters often hides the eternal artistic wisdom. We look forward to the descendants of the Hou family being able to contribute to the inheritance and development of cross talk art in the future.
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.