Greg, vice president of the American Institute of Astronautics, said that the United States landed on the moon 50 years ago, and Chang'e-6 is just doing something repetitive.
With the successful return of Chang'e-6 to collect soil on the back of the moon, the eyes of China and abroad have once again focused on our lunar exploration program.
Recently, the "Consumer News and Business Channel" (CNBC) in the United States interviewed Gregg, vice president of the American Institute of Astronautics, about the return of Chang'e-6 with lunar soil.
In the first half of the interview, Professor Greg, who is currently a professor at the Thunderbird School of Global Management and the school's "Director of Space Leadership", commented positively on the successful return of Chang'e-6.
However, in the second half of the interview, the professor claimed that it was normal for the U.S. Peregrine Falcon's lunar lander mission to be frustrated at the beginning of the year, because it was a launch mission operated by a private American company, which was a different model of lunar exploration from China's.
As long as the U.S. commercial rocket lands on the moon, then the U.S. will suddenly have a number of more companies that can return with lunar soil!
At the same time, Greg also brazenly claimed that the United States did the moon landing 50 years ago, and Chang'e-6 is now just repeating what the United States did 50 years ago.
Loading...
According to Greg's meaning, the so-called "commercial rocket launch model" in the United States is more advanced than our current model.
From Greg's long-term point of view, if the United States continues to follow its current "advanced model," the United States' space position will become even stronger, and our space position will be overtaken by the United States.
After listening to the professor's words, I didn't know how to evaluate it for a while, and it was rare to see anyone who could say that the unsuccess of the lunar exploration mission was so fresh and refined.
This so-called "private commercial rocket launch model" is like an almighty excuse to dump the blame on the "business model" when the US lunar probe launch fails.
And if the launch is successful, the United States can say that this is the superiority of the "commercial launch model", and in any case, it is the rhetoric of "the United States leading".
To borrow the words of the comments of netizens below, the reason why we can catch up with the United States is because we never pretend to be ahead and never make excuses for failure.
And another netizen's question also just expresses our mood at this time, the United States, which has been mentioning how successful it was in the past, but making excuses for its failure now, really gives people a sense of decline and decline.
Finally, I still hope that the future space exploration of the United States will really lead to a new mode of exploration, as Professor Greg said.
After all, the exploration of deep space is a global vision, and the success of the United States represents our success and the success of humanity on earth!