"Haitian Eagle": Why do military dramas have to fall in love here?
To be honest, as a military fan, I'm quite satisfied with the overall performance of this show. The cast is strong, and the flight training scenes are exciting and thrilling, which undoubtedly brings a visual feast to the audience. But at the same time, I also have to complain that some of the meaningless love lines in this drama are really unacceptable.
As a senior self-media blogger, I have always believed that military-type TV dramas should focus on showing the true colors of heroes and highlighting the lofty ideals and unremitting pursuit of soldiers. But in "Haitian Eagle", the screenwriters shoehorned in two completely unrelated emotional scenes, which can't help but make me feel like "going in the opposite direction".
What is driving screenwriters to make such a choice? Is it to cater to the tastes of the audience? Or do you simply want to mix a little "dog blood" element in a military blockbuster? All in all, this approach really puzzles me.
What is even more puzzling to me is that these two female characters not only distract the audience, but even "steal the show" from the male protagonists. What makes me wonder why in a drama with aircraft carrier flight training as the main line, some unrelated love entanglements are suddenly inserted? Isn't that overkill?
As a senior self-media blogger, I have published many views and suggestions on the creation of domestic TV dramas on multiple platforms. From my point of view, if "Haitian Eagle" can greatly cut or adapt these unnecessary emotional lines, and focus on showing the heroic deeds of pilots in training and performing missions, I believe that this drama will definitely gain more audience's favor.
After all, the audience should be most concerned about the unremitting efforts of these elite pilots in the process of achieving the "goal of strengthening the army", rather than some offensive love scenes. However, it is a pity that this practice of shoehorning love elements into military themes seems to have become an "unspoken rule" in the creation of domestic dramas.
Going back to the drama "Haitian Eagle", I personally think that if the scenes of these two lovers can be greatly reduced, focusing on the main narrative of flight training and mission, I believe the audience's experience will be greatly improved. After all, an excellent military drama should make people feel the prosperity of Rongma, not a chaotic emotional line.
Of course, it is not enough to just delete the meaningless love line, the screenwriting team also needs to re-examine the positioning and role of the three female characters in the play. The reason why I emphasize this point is because I found that in many domestic dramas, female characters are often reduced to "vassals" of male characters, and at best they are the objects of some emotional sustenance.
This practice is undoubtedly a kind of neglect and debasement of the status of women. In my opinion, if the screenwriting team of "Haitian Eagle" can make these three female characters really use their professional qualities, rather than just serving as the emotional sustenance of the male protagonist, I believe it will make the whole show even better.
After all, in the current film and television market environment, audiences have become more aware of the status and value of female roles. Blindly portraying them as "vassals" will only make the audience feel disgusted and incomprehensible. I believe that if the screenwriting team can re-examine the role of these three female characters in the plot, it will definitely make the audience gain a more "hardcore" viewing experience.
Speaking of which, I can't help but think of some netizen comments I saw on the Internet before. Some people complain that in the current domestic dramas, no matter which military branch, as long as it involves military themes, there will definitely be various love lines. This made me think deeply.
What is driving screenwriters to make such a choice? Is it to cater to the tastes of the audience? Or do you simply want to mix a little "dog blood" element in a military blockbuster? All in all, this approach really puzzles me.
To be honest, as a senior self-media blogger, I have always believed that military-type TV dramas should focus on showing the true colors of heroes and highlighting the lofty ideals and unremitting pursuit of soldiers. But in "Haitian Eagle", the screenwriters shoehorned in two completely unrelated emotional scenes, which can't help but make me feel like "going in the opposite direction".
What is even more puzzling to me is that these two female characters not only distract the audience, but even "steal the show" from the male protagonists. What makes me wonder why in a drama with aircraft carrier flight training as the main line, some unrelated love entanglements are suddenly inserted? Isn't that overkill?
As a senior self-media blogger, I have always believed that if "Haitian Eagle" can greatly cut or adapt these meaningless emotional lines, focusing on showing the heroic deeds of pilots in training and performing missions, I believe that this drama will definitely gain the favor of more audiences.
After all, the audience should be most concerned about the unremitting efforts of these elite pilots in the process of achieving the "goal of strengthening the army", rather than some offensive love scenes. However, it is a pity that this practice of shoehorning love elements into military themes seems to have become an "unspoken rule" in the creation of domestic dramas.
As a self-media blogger with many years of experience, I have mentioned this problem in many articles. In my opinion, this approach is undoubtedly a kind of "counterattack". After all, viewers watch military-type TV dramas because they want to feel that kind of heroism, rather than being distracted by some inconsequential emotional entanglements.
Of course, it is not enough to just delete the meaningless love line, the screenwriting team also needs to re-examine the positioning and role of the three female characters in the play. The reason why I emphasize this point is because I found that in many domestic dramas, female characters are often reduced to "vassals" of male characters, and at best they are the objects of some emotional sustenance.
This practice is undoubtedly a kind of neglect and debasement of the status of women. In my opinion, if the screenwriting team of "Haitian Eagle" can make these three female characters really use their professional qualities, rather than just serving as the emotional sustenance of the male protagonist, I believe it will make the whole show even better.
After all, in the current film and television market environment, audiences have become more aware of the status and value of female roles. Blindly portraying them as "vassals" will only make the audience feel disgusted and incomprehensible. I believe that if the screenwriting team can re-examine the role of these three female characters in the plot, it will definitely make the audience gain a more "hardcore" viewing experience.
Speaking of which, I can't help but sigh that in the creation of domestic TV dramas, there seems to have always been such a strange phenomenon - no matter which branch of the military, as long as it involves military themes, there will definitely be various love lines. Whether this is to cater to the tastes of the audience or the screenwriters' own creative preferences is really difficult for me to understand.
As a veteran self-media blogger, I have been paying attention to this issue. In my opinion, military-themed TV dramas should focus on showing the feats of those heroes and soldiers in the process of realizing their dreams of strengthening the army, so that the audience can truly feel the spirit of fearless sacrifice. Instead of being distracted by some inconsequential emotional entanglement.
But in "Haitian Eagle", the screenwriters stubbornly stuffed two completely unrelated love lines, which can't help but puzzle me. What is even more puzzling to me is that these two female characters not only distract the audience, but even "steal the show" from the male protagonists. What exactly is this for?
To be honest, as a military fan, I'm quite satisfied with the overall performance of this show. After all, the cast is strong, and the flight training scenes are exciting and thrilling, which undoubtedly brings a visual feast to the audience. But at the same time, I also have to complain that this kind of shoehorning love elements into military blockbusters really makes me feel unacceptable.
As a senior self-media blogger, I have always believed that if "Haitian Eagle" can greatly cut or adapt these meaningless emotional lines, focusing on showing the heroic deeds of pilots in training and performing missions, I believe that this drama will definitely gain the favor of more audiences.
After all, the audience should be most concerned about the unremitting efforts of these elite pilots in the process of achieving the "goal of strengthening the army", rather than some offensive love scenes. It's a pity that this practice of shoehorning love elements into military themes seems to have become an "unspoken rule" in the creation of domestic dramas.
As a self-media blogger with many years of experience, I have mentioned this problem in many articles. In my opinion, this approach is undoubtedly a kind of "counterattack". After all, viewers watch military-type TV dramas because they want to feel that kind of heroism, rather than being distracted by some inconsequential emotional entanglements.
Of course, it is not enough to just delete the meaningless love line, the screenwriting team also needs to re-examine the positioning and role of the three female characters in the play. The reason why I emphasize this point is because I found that in many domestic dramas, female characters are often reduced to "vassals" of male characters, and at best they are the objects of some emotional sustenance.
This practice is undoubtedly a kind of neglect and debasement of the status of women. In my opinion, if the screenwriting team of "Haitian Eagle" can make these three female characters really use their professional qualities, rather than just serving as the emotional sustenance of the male protagonist, I believe it will make the whole show even better.
After all, in the current film and television market environment, audiences have become more aware of the status and value of female roles. Blindly portraying them as "vassals" will only make the audience feel disgusted and incomprehensible. I believe that if the screenwriting team can re-examine the role of these three female characters in the plot, it will definitely make the audience gain a more "hardcore" viewing experience.
As a senior self-media blogger, I believe that as long as the screenwriting team of "Haitian Eagle" can face up to these problems and make corresponding adjustments, this high-quality military-themed drama will definitely satisfy more audiences. After all, an excellent military drama should make people feel the prosperity of Rongma, not a chaotic emotional line.