On June 30, 2024, Comrade Li Changping, President of the China Academy of Rural Construction, collaborator of rural construction, and creator of high-quality agriculture, rural areas, and rural areas, published an article titled "It is better to subsidize agricultural production than to subsidize farmers for the elderly". In his article, Li Changping mainly expounded the following reasoning: To solve the problems existing in the rural areas, we are currently subsidizing agricultural production with a large amount of financial funds, which will only intensify the involution of agricultural production and operation. As a result, although the yield of land has increased, the peasants' income has decreased, resulting in both financial and peasant losses and poverty!
Li Changping appealed: All the land in the rural areas should be returned to the collective, reorganized, and then the professional teams in the village community should engage in the responsibility system for production and operation, and the vast majority of the contracted income will be used for the elderly over 65 years old! In addition, all kinds of financial subsidies to stimulate agricultural production will be abolished, and all the original subsidies will be used for the peasants' pension! This is not only beneficial to the agricultural industry, but also solves the problem of farmers' pension.
Li Changping's proposal has aroused heated discussions and resonance among the majority of netizens on the Internet, and netizens believe that Li Changping's bold proposal has a certain amount of truth. The annual subsidies provided by the state to rural areas are astronomical, which has also led to the problems of corruption and interception. Although the state has also thought of many ways to do this, for example, directly distributing some subsidies benefiting farmers to farmers through the real-name system of banks. Even so, netizens still believe that what really comes to the farmers may only be a drop in the bucket.
Of course, some subsidies for agricultural infrastructure are still necessary. However, these subsidies must be followed up by discipline inspection and auditing in a timely manner. Look at the problems that are often reported on the Internet in the construction of rural farmland infrastructure, what fake machine wells, false irrigation facilities, false standard farmland, etc., even if it is a rural toilet renovation, I am afraid that careful inspection will also find such and such problems. Therefore, sometimes the money to subsidize agriculture is like Tang monk meat, and everyone wants to eat it. It is inevitable that the interests of the businessmen will be entangled with the interests of the individual who hold the power, and the subsidies will almost all go into the pockets of some people.
Therefore, netizens think that Li Changping's proposal of "subsidizing agricultural production is better than subsidizing farmers for the elderly" is very reasonable. If this is really done one day, the old farmer will solve the pension problem by the age of 60, which is much better than those officials and businessmen who cheat the subsidy and run away. Netizens firmly agree that the state will take out part of the funds to directly subsidize farmers for the elderly, which is very necessary.
At present, the elderly in rural areas can only receive a pension of more than 100 yuan at the age of 60, which is simply not enough for the minimum living guarantee. Therefore, most netizens think that Li Changping's suggestion is powerful. However, some people say that the pension insurance system is fair, that is, pay more and get more. The peasants have not paid pension insurance, and now they can give more than 100 yuan to the state, and it is unreasonable to give money if they make a fuss about the "peasants". I hope that people with this point of view will pat their conscience and say, is it really reasonable for farmers to only have a pension of more than 100 yuan per month?
The peasants did not pay pension insurance, which was caused by the system at that time. However, in those years, the peasants had a heavy burden of paying public grain, and the grain and vegetables we ate were all provided by the peasants. It can also be said that we were fed by farmers back then. They have made great contributions to the construction of socialism, and it is unfair that they will be left unattended when they are old. Therefore, we support Li Changping's proposal: it is better to subsidize agricultural production than to subsidize farmers for the elderly!
#头条首发大赛#