laitimes

-for-tat internally, surprisingly unified with China? The U.S. election may not discern new developments in U.S.-China relations

author:Land abandonment

Text: Lu abandoned

The first televised debate of the U.S. election is about to begin, and Biden, an 81-year-old man, will face off against another 78-year-old Trump. This showdown is very eye-catching, and I am afraid that it is inseparable from Sino-US relations, which also include the Taiwan issue, and whether or not the Taiwan issue will be directly discussed or only the Sino-US issue will be discussed on the spot, which is of course a point of concern to everyone.

-for-tat internally, surprisingly unified with China? The U.S. election may not discern new developments in U.S.-China relations

In addition to various domestic and foreign relations, what are the differences between the two of them in Sino-US relations and on the issue of the Taiwan Strait? Both Trump and Biden have a characteristic, they basically talk nonsense to the media, and Trump's speeches are often unspoken and unstoppable, which is Trump's characteristic. This is not the case for Biden, who is likely to refer to his aides to a certain extent, but Biden has another characteristic that Trump does not have, because everyone suspects that Biden may have Alzheimer's disease.

For example, he will name people from several decades ago, so he will suddenly say that the time and space are dislocated 30 years ago, for example, it is possible that Lai Qingde will be described as Lee Teng-hui or Chen Shui-bian and so on. What may happen to these two is different, and their attitudes towards the Taiwan Strait are basically not very different between their aides and their aides on the views of the Taiwan Strait, but I am afraid that the direct statements of the two men in the televised debate will be completely different.

-for-tat internally, surprisingly unified with China? The U.S. election may not discern new developments in U.S.-China relations

It may be that their aides are now in a similar direction in the general direction of their stance on Sino-US relations in the US political arena, but the problem is that there is a characteristic feature of this debate: the two old gentlemen did not have a team of advisers or a team of assistants to guide them when they went into the live TV room. When they entered the live broadcast room, this time it was stipulated that a person only had a pen, a piece of paper and a bottle of water, and they could not bring materials or assistants, and there was no audience at the scene.

Recently, public opinion in the United States said that the support of the two of them may be about 55 in this debate, and whether Trump will have a greater advantage under such rules. If the debate is 90 minutes long and you have to stand and not sit down, will Trump have some of this to do? If you look at Trump's various performances during the recent court hearings and the announcement of the relevant verdicts, and compare Biden's reaction in the media, it seems that Biden's risk is relatively much higher.

-for-tat internally, surprisingly unified with China? The U.S. election may not discern new developments in U.S.-China relations

The probability that Trump will launch an all-out onslaught or set a trap for Biden to fall into looks very high, because Biden may enter a state of dislocation in time and space. If Biden talks about Sino-US relations and the Taiwan Strait in this televised debate, perhaps he will find himself in a state where he does not know what time and space is, and it is possible to say the wrong thing. But all in all, the two people may have strong opposition on this domestic policy, but in fact, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party still have common overlap in dealing with the issue of Sino-US relations. This may also be a focus of our attention in their debate.

Copyright Notice: This article is the author's original article, the picture comes from the Internet, the text content of this article is strictly prohibited from being illegally reproduced without authorization, if you need to reprint or quote must obtain the author's consent and indicate the source.

Read on