The same experts, such a big difference? On June 24, 2024, the 2023 National Highest Science and Technology Award was announced, and the gold content of this award is self-evident. One of the experts who won this highest honor in China's scientific and technological circles is Academician Li Deren, a well-known expert in remote sensing surveying and mapping in China. One of Academician Li Deren's major achievements is that he confirmed for the first time four years that the resolution of the mainland's GF-11 remote sensing satellite has reached 0.1 meters.
So what is the concept of this 0.1 meter resolution? According to the content of the interview with Academician Li Deren, he said, first, this shows that the Chinese are self-reliant, independent innovation, and have reached the world's advanced level. The best "keyhole" satellite in the United States is also 0.1 meters, and GF-11 can be compared to American technology. The second is that the self-sufficiency rate of China's satellites has reached 85%, which has exceeded the expected 60% after 15 years of efforts. Do you think that's the end of it?
In the report, Academician Li Deren also proved for the first time that many of China's satellites have achieved the ability to search for moving targets at sea, with an accuracy of less than 10 meters, which is basically in accordance with a single standard. In fact, the "Jilin-1" satellite has been able to continuously photograph fighter jets flying in the air before, and this time it once again proves the ability to search for sea targets, in fact, Chinese satellites have the ability to lock on to US aircraft carriers and dynamically track stealth fighters such as F22 or F35.
Academician Wang Deren also said that with the joint efforts of Academician Wang Liheng and other experts, 14 high-resolution satellites have been planned, of which 1-7 are civilian satellites, and the other 8-14 are military satellites, including optical and radar satellites, and a number of X-band radar satellites will be supplemented in the future.
I believe that everyone is very excited to see the experience of expert Wang Deren, this is a real expert for the country and the people. But the difference between the same experts is still very big. For example, Professor Yao Yang of Peking University recently said that he understands and supports the EU's imposition of tariffs on China's new energy vehicles.
In the interview, he said that it is normal for them (the EU) to impose tariffs, that people need to protect their own industries, and that China needs to adapt to this trend. The most important thing is that the expert said that the 21% tariff will not have much impact on us, and also let us give Europe time to adjust, we have to understand, and not to counteract in a hurry. This statement is an eye-opener, why do you say that?
Even if tariffs are a means to protect our own industries, we do so under WTO rules, and I have never seen any EU experts come out and say that they want to understand our difficulties. This expert's spirit of thinking about others everywhere is indeed rare.
Then the 21% tariff has no effect on us, and I really don't know where this sentence comes from, which makes me marvel at the economic level of this Peking University expert. Since it doesn't matter, then we can also impose reciprocal tariffs on the EU, and it won't affect it anyway. Of course, the expert once again showed double standards at this time, saying that he should not understand how to counteract others. This may be to say that on June 17, China's Ministry of Commerce issued an announcement deciding to launch an anti-dumping investigation into import-related pork and pig by-products originating in the EU. Since the experts have said that this is to protect their own industry, why do they do this, and why are the experts so unhappy?
As for what exactly is the European Union, which this expert is bent on defending, how is it doing? Bloomberg reported that the European Union lowered additional tariffs on electric vehicles imported from China, SAIC from 38.1% to 37.6%, Geely from 20% to 19.9%, and BYD to keep the additional tariffs unchanged at 17.4%. How about the reduction rate ranging from 0.5%-0.1%? It's just for you to be ugly, so you say it's a concession, right? Don't say it doesn't give you face. The West has been so consistently aggressive in the negotiations on trade disputes, do we still need to understand it?
Generally speaking, most of the experts in the sciences are for the benefit of the country and the people, while it is difficult to say about the liberal arts. And on June 24, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Campbell publicly declared at a think tank event that the U.S. should welcome more students from China, but "study the humanities, not the sciences." That's probably the trick to it. Science is materialistic, technology is objective, and liberal arts are mostly idealistic, and it is easy to accept the Western set of views in its entirety, and it is easy to go astray.
If you don't pay attention, you will become this professor, you have to understand the European Union, don't worry about it, then please ask if the loss of the enterprise caused and the decline in employee income caused by the professor are out of the professor's pocket, if so, then it really doesn't care. On the other hand, Academician Li Deren really uses his knowledge to defend the interests of the country and the nation, so that the people can live in a safe country in this world that is not safe.