Loading...
Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Ladies and gentlemen, have you heard? Recently, there has been a lot of uproar in the entertainment industry, and there is no other reason, that is, a paper written by our big star Yang Mi "On the Creative Habits of Actors in Film and Television Dramas" failed to pass the review, which really caused an uproar.
This paper, don't look at the title is just a "shallow talk", but in fact, it contains Yang Mi's deep understanding and superb analysis of the film and television industry.
However, some people mistakenly think that the content of this paper is thin because of the word "shallow talk", which is really a big mistake.
The word "shallow talk" is actually Yang Mi's humble expression after in-depth research, which means that although she has discussed it in depth, she still feels that there are more knowledge and details worth excavating.
Let's talk about the plagiarism rate of this paper, which is staggeringly low.
It's jaw-dropping.
However, this low repetition rate is not a bad thing, but it proves that Yang Mi's paper is extremely original, which is a rare quality in the academic field.
Although this has aroused some doubts from the outside world, we have to see that this is actually a reflection of Yang Mi's real efforts in academic research, and it is definitely not a defect.
Through this controversy, Yang Mi not only showed her deep insight into the film and television industry, but also showed her detailed research and in-depth exploration of the creative habits within the industry.
Her analysis, not only based on personal experience, but also has the potential to inspire other professionals in the industry to engage in broader discussion and research, which is of great significance for the development of the entire film and television industry.
It is worth noting that there is also a problem exposed in this controversy, which is the misunderstanding of some people about low duplicate check rates.
In the academic world, it is important to cite the research and arguments of others, but it does not mean that every paper has to be widely cited by previous researchers.
Just like this paper by Yang Mi, her research is mainly based on personal practice and direct experience, which not only demonstrates her originality, but also reflects the unique value of extracting insights and insights from practical operations.
Therefore, the low repetition rate in her paper should not be regarded as a flaw, but rather as a strong proof of the independence of her observation and analysis.
Some people question Yang Mi because of the low repetition rate of this paper, which really ignores the author's efforts and the actual value of the paper.
We must know that academic evaluation should pay more attention to the depth of content and the innovation of ideas, rather than simply pursuing citation rate.
In addition, Yang Mi used the traditional academic title of "author" in his paper to maintain the formality and objectivity of his writing.
Some people regard this as an obstacle to publication, which is really wrong.
This shows her respect and adaptation to the norms of academic writing.
Our evaluation of Yang Mi's paper must be based on the depth and uniqueness of her content, and should not be entangled in those traditional forms or external standards.
Her research provides a novel perspective and insightful analysis of creative habits in the field of film and television dramas, which is worthy of wider discussion in our academic and industrial circles.
The controversy surrounding her dissertation also reflects the public's high concern for academic creation and freedom of expression, and also reminds us that when discussing academic works, we should pay more attention to the substance rather than the constraints of form.