laitimes

Jinglu vs. now controversial penalty, handball in the Dabao penalty area, referee + VAR determined that it was not a penalty

author:The return of the king WSY

The latest news on July 1, Beijing time, was held last night in a Jinglu battle, which became one of the hot topics in this round of the Chinese Super League after the game. In addition to Beijing Guoan, the score of the whole game was fixed at 2-0 in only 5 minutes of the opening game, and the final score was also Beijing Guoan's 2-0 victory over Shandong Taishan. Another point is that Yu Dabao's handball in the penalty area in the second half, referee Xing Qi and VAR referee Huang Yi did not award a penalty, which became a relatively controversial decision.

Jinglu vs. now controversial penalty, handball in the Dabao penalty area, referee + VAR determined that it was not a penalty

In the 77th minute of the second half of the game, Shandong Taishan got a good chance to score a goal, Wu Xinghan entered the penalty area of Beijing Guoan and completed a blast, but the ball hit the arm of Beijing Guoan player Yu Dabao. The Shandong Taishan players on the field all thought it was a penalty.

Jinglu vs. now controversial penalty, handball in the Dabao penalty area, referee + VAR determined that it was not a penalty

At the first time, neither the linesman nor the referee Xing Qi said anything, and Xing Qi signaled that he wanted to communicate with the VAR referee. In this season's Chinese Super League, VAR will intervene in any goal or foul in the penalty area, as well as a foul by Poly, and this time is no exception.

Jinglu vs. now controversial penalty, handball in the Dabao penalty area, referee + VAR determined that it was not a penalty

After the referee Xing Qi communicated with VAR referee Huang Yi through the headset, he came to the sidelines to watch the replay of the game footage, and finally determined that Yu Dabao's handball did not constitute a foul and blew away the real penalty.

Jinglu vs. now controversial penalty, handball in the Dabao penalty area, referee + VAR determined that it was not a penalty

After VAR intervention, the referee determined that Yu Dabao's ball, with his arm not open, was not a penalty. ——Lenovo naturally caused dissatisfaction among the players, coaching staff and fans of the Shandong Taishan team. In fact, in the group stage of the European Cup some time ago, the Texas team played against the Danish team, the Danish player Anderson handball in the penalty area was almost exactly the same as Yu Dabao, the arm was not opened, but the ball hit the arm, which did change the direction of the ball. After the referee and VAR referee intervened to blow the game, they determined that the handball in the penalty area of Danish player Anderson was a penalty, and the German striker Havertz took the penalty and hit the goal in one fell swoop.

Jinglu vs. now controversial penalty, handball in the Dabao penalty area, referee + VAR determined that it was not a penalty

Therefore, according to the penalty scale of the European Cup, Yu Dabao's handball in the penalty area should be a penalty kick without dispute. However, the domestic local referees who blew the Chinese Super League game were rigid and dogmatic, stubborn, and had a low level of business, and such an obvious penalty was not considered a penalty. It is said that the level of Chinese football is very low, and now it seems that the professional level of China's local referees is also very low, no wonder in the World Football Series, FIFA does not dare to use Chinese referees at all, which is really sad and lamentable!

Read on