Questioning of doubts. There are various versions of the question, each with vulnerabilities. For example, in order to gain more time to answer questions, the teacher registers two more accounts, each account staggers the answering time, three 8 hours staggered is 24 hours, the first two accounts first get the question and start thinking about the calculus, and Mr. Wang uses the last account to submit the answer. It sounds plausible and is indeed a great cheat. But the same method can also be used by other contestants, like Qingbei, where geniuses gather in places where it is easier to get together to do questions, and the good ranking is absolutely monopolized by them. But there is a premise for such inferences: the contestants are willing to cheat. Isn't that the presumption of guilt? If this presumption is true, each participant needs to check the authenticity of their results. Then this competition is simply a farce. The rules of the game are child's play, deliberately leaving room for cheating. The proportion of people who study advanced mathematics is very small, and the designers of advanced mathematics competition questions are not mortals, even AI is available, and they are obviously not afraid of you cheating. If a contestant solves a problem with the help of another person's intelligence, it means that the other person can participate in the competition on their own. Everyone is a cow, who obeys whom? In order to get the ranking, I went to ask for advice from Niu Yi Niu Er, is it a shame to lose people? ! If you believe that the three stinkers competed with Zhuge Liang to solve the competition problem, so many conjectures would have been answered earlier. Mathematics is a high-order intellectual dance, playing with endorphins, and cheating is an insult to mathematics, an insult to one's own intelligence and personality.
