Magnolia Award Turmoil: Where is the Fairness? Hu Ge and Zhou Xun's award caused controversy, and the organizer was scolded miserably
Recently, the Magnolia Award has really made a fuss, which makes us melon-eating people stunned. If you want to say that this award was originally a very important award, but this time, why is the selection result so confusing?
Hu Ge and Zhou Xun, the two big names, actually became the focus of this wave of controversy, which is really laughable.
Let's talk about the Magnolia Award first. This award is like a "white lotus" in the film and television circle, it looks quite pure, but in fact?
Does anyone know how much of this is behind it?
Let's take a look at the nominees first, and there are the final winners later in the article
The results of this selection are like a hodgepodge, with everything, but it lacks a little "fair" seasoning. What do you think is the selection criteria?
We don't understand, but it's pretty mysterious anyway.
Zhou Xun and Hu Ge are the pillars of our domestic film and television industry, and they lack nothing in acting, appearance, and popularity.
But what about this time?
The two of them have become synonymous with "not qualified to win the award", which is really laughable.
You say they can't act? That's impossible, but it took many years of hard work for people to get to where they are today.
You say they're not popular enough? That's even more outrageous, the fan base of these two people is terrifyingly huge.
Hu Ge can understand that he won the award, but Zhou Xun's award is really about to draw a question mark
So why are the two of them questioned as "not eligible for the award"?
This matter has to start with the selection mechanism of the Magnolia Award. It is said that in this selection process, some judges' "personal preferences" accounted for a large proportion.
You say that the judges are also human beings, and it is normal to have preferences, but if you use this preference as a selection criterion, it is a bit too much. In this way, those actors who are really powerful and talented may be brushed off because they didn't "match their eyes".
Of course, the judges can't be blamed for this. After all, there are many complex factors in the selection process, and it is not so simple to explain.
But what about the organizers? Then I'll have to talk about it. Do you think the organizers should be more fair and transparent in the selection process?
But what about them? It's like playing "hide and seek", making the selection process mysterious and confusing. In this way, it will inevitably cause everyone's doubts and dissatisfaction.
Sure enough, as soon as the results of the Magnolia Award were announced, the Internet exploded. Everyone expressed dissatisfaction and doubts, and some even scolded the organizers directly.
What about this organizer? It's miserable enough, I was scolded so bloody that I didn't even dare to comment in the end.
Why do you say that? If you had announced the selection criteria and process earlier, so that everyone knew what they were doing, they wouldn't have ended up where they are now.
Speaking of this, it's also quite emotional. This Magnolia Award was originally a very important award, but what about this time? But because of the unfairness and controversy of the selection results, everyone lost confidence in it.
Who else would believe in this award after that? Who else would take it seriously?
Of course, the Magnolia Award can't be blamed entirely for this. After all, there are many complex factors in this selection process, and it is not so simple to explain.
No matter what industry or field, we must pay attention to "fairness" and "transparency". Only in this way can we convince and satisfy everyone.
Finally, I want to say that this Magnolia Award has to reflect on it. Don't bury those really powerful and talented actors.
Otherwise, your "White Lotus" will really become a "rotten cabbage"!