Recently, the situation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict has developed a bit fast.
The interior of the battlefield is not bad, Russia is gradually expanding its superiority, boiling frogs in warm water against Ukraine. But outside the battlefield, NATO is fully preparing for war, and 300,000 troops are rapidly deployed, ready to go to war with the Russian army at any time. At the same time, the United States operated behind the scenes, instructed terrorist organizations, and launched a number of attacks on Russian soil, killing many people.
It is clear that the conflict is escalating, and the powder keg of NATO and Russia will be detonated at any time. But soon, the turning point came, and after more than a year, U.S. Secretary of Defense Austin held a conference call with Russia's new Defense Minister Belousov. This is good news, and as long as there are still talks between the United States and Russia, it can show that the conflict has not completely gotten out of control.
Moreover, the United States has recently released an important signal, claiming that the US military will never send troops to Ukraine. In this regard, the outside world has different views, and the United States is trying to cool down the conflict and give an account to Russia at this juncture? Or is there no silver three hundred taels here, and a trick is used against Russia to delay the army?
In fact, the answer has already been given by the United States itself. Because on the same day that the United States made a statement to Russia, the White House made a small news that was not too inconspicuous, and Biden was considering lifting a ban related to the war in Ukraine.
In the early days of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the White House set several bans.
For example, the American-made weapons used by Ukraine cannot be used against the Russian mainland. But as you know, this ban has been lifted. In addition, the White House has also restricted US private military companies and contractors from providing military assistance and cannot send people to deploy directly in Ukraine.
Now, the White House is considering this and intends to lift the ban. The reason given is that when US private military companies enter Ukraine, it will be easier for them to maintain and repair American-made weapons in Ukraine. In this way, the loss of weapons in Ukraine can be significantly reduced.
Do you think humans and animals are harmless? However, it should be clear to everyone that the business scope covered by US private military companies is by no means as simple as repairing weapons. Everyone has heard of Blackwater, a well-known private military company in the United States. In the Iraq War, he fought with the U.S. military, participated in many low- and medium-intensity battles, and killed many Iraqi civilians.
So, the repair of weapons and equipment is just an excuse for the White House. Said to be a "maintenance worker", but in fact a mercenary. Moreover, they are well-equipped and disciplined mercenaries who have deep cooperation with the US government. The lifting of this restriction by the United States and the entry of private military companies into Ukraine is nothing more than sending troops in disguise.
This is the same thing as what I said before, that the United States used the method of "military advisers" to involve the US military in the war in Ukraine. After all, the Pentagon has openly said that private military companies are an inseparable part of the entire armed forces of the United States. And it can't let Ukraine lose, and it doesn't want to go to war with Russia, so the United States has no choice but to rack its brains and save Ukraine.