The return of lunar samples to Earth is a rage in the scientific community! On this grand stage of science and technology, a question from an American reporter caused an uproar. This is not only a grand event of scientific research, but also a scene of the international aerospace political drama.
On June 27, a double drama of technology and diplomacy is unfolding on the other side of the world. China's Chang'e-6 mission was successfully completed, bringing back valuable lunar samples. At a press conference at this historic moment, an American reporter's question unexpectedly ignited public outrage.
He asked: Is there a chance for American scientists to participate in the study of these samples from the moon? The issue is not only touching on scientific cooperation, but also deeply rooted in the complex diplomatic relations between the two countries.
As soon as the question came out, the atmosphere suddenly became tense. Chinese representative Bian Zhigang gave a straightforward answer, mentioning that the US "Wolf Clause" has become a stumbling block to Sino-US space cooperation.
This bill restricts any cooperation and contact between NASA and Chinese scientific institutions, making it extremely difficult for scientists on both sides to communicate and cooperate. Bian's answer sends a clear signal: while China is willing to open up research cooperation, it must first address political obstacles.
Further complicating matters, when Bian Zhigang mentioned that China's scientific and technological progress no longer needs to rely on foreign technology learning, the entire space community reacted strongly to this.
There was a hint of pride and provocation in his words, which meant that China was full of self-confidence in the field of aerospace science and technology, and was no longer the technologically backward student. He also lamented that the United States is currently in a "restless menopause", with both mood and policy instability, and in this situation, scientific cooperation is even more out of reach.
He then highlighted China's space station program and future space exploration projects, indicating that China's future plans for space are clear and cooperation with the United States is not necessary. His answer not only dropped a bombshell politically, but also sparked widespread discussion and attention in the tech community.
The press conference became the focus of the global media. China's position is clear and firm, showing that it is strong enough to be independent in the international scientific and technological arena. The U.S. "Wolf Clause" has once again been pushed to the forefront, and its impact on international scientific research cooperation has been widely criticized. This event not only reflects the close connection between science and technology and politics, but also demonstrates the complexity and challenges of international cooperation.
This is not only a display of scientific research achievements, but also a contest of international political and scientific and technological strength. Today, with the rapid development of global science and technology, every decision and answer may affect the global pattern of scientific and technological cooperation.