The average working time of the post-95 generation is only 7 months, and these are the reasons for frequent job hopping?
First of all, it is said that the salary is unreasonable. The post-95 generation generally thinks that the salary increase depends on job hopping, and with a salary of 3,000 but with a heart of 30,000, what can be achieved with this ability to resist pressure? Can't hold on for too long, isn't it a problem of its own?
In addition, the welfare package is poor. Weekends, annual leave, normal holiday benefits, five insurances and one housing fund, these originally normal working conditions, are now said to be luxury. Isn't it because the post-95s generation is too idealistic and doesn't understand the cruelty of the real workplace?
Also, the work is stressful. Can't stand 996? If you can't ensure a work-life balance, don't do it? Isn't this a sign of evading responsibility and not being able to endure hardship?
Finally, career development is limited. If you resign decisively after working for a period of time and find that you have no future, can't you accumulate steadily and wait for opportunities? The post-95 generation pays so much attention to the upper limit of career development in the later stage, is it too eager for quick success and low vision?
The post-95 generation always said that they should pursue a personalized life, emotional freedom, pay attention to the quality of life, and forget the work mode of being a cow and a horse. But isn't that an excuse for their willfulness, lack of responsibility and loyalty? In such a competitive society, can this attitude really set them up for success?
I wonder what everyone thinks about this?
